Legal Opinion
Kehaya v. Axton
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 15, 1940PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOOLSEY, District Judge.
My judgment in this cause is:(1) That the complaint be dismissed on the merits with all taxable costs, disbursements and allowances to each of the defendants.(2) That this plaintiff has not any locus standi to maintain this action by reason of the fact that he is not any longer a director of the corporate defendant, the Ax-ton-Fisher Tobacco Company.
I. My subject matter jurisdiction herein is based on diversity of citizenship and on the fact that the amount involved exceeds the statutory requirement.
All questions of personal jurisdiction and of venue, such as the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Gamble v. Queens County Water Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
- United States v. New River Collieries Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Miller v. . QuincyNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
- Thorn v. . De BreteuilNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Dillon v. BergDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1971
- Tenney v. RosenthalNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
- Turner v. American Metal Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
- Johnson v. BALDWINSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1952
- Levitt v. Calvary Temple of DenverColorado Court of Appeals · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.