Legal Opinion

Clare v. Guidi

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1958Published

1Opinion of the CourtHamilton Ward, J.

Motion by defendant that the damages sustained by the defendant by reason of a warrant of attachment be ascertained, determined and assessed by the court or by a referee to be appointed by the court, or by such means and in such manner as the court may determine and direct.

On or about October 2, 1957, plaintiff instituted the above-entitled action against the defendant by the service upon her of a summons and complaint together with a warrant of attachment, by virtue of which an automobile allegedly owned by the defendant was seized.

In connection with the warrant of attachment, the plaintiff…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Pease v. Rathbun-Jones Engineering Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Roberts v. . WhiteNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  3. Wynkoop v. Van BeurenNew York Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Alden v. ClarkNew York Supreme Court · 1855
  5. Universal Transp. Co. v. National Surety Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1918

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API