Legal Opinion
Tamminga v. Suter
District Court, N.D. Iowa
Decided December 7, 1962No. Civ. No. 1273PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DELEHANT, District Judge.
Pending for present ruling in this action is a pleading served and filed by the plaintiffs and entitled, MOTION TO DISMISS PETITION FOR REMOVAL (filing 6). In the context of the action, now very briefly to be reflected, that motion of the plaintiffs is appropriately being regarded and treated as a motion to remand. It ought so to have been entitled.
On February 23, 1962, the plaintiffs, who are husband and wife, filed in the District Court of Iowa, in and for Wood-bury County, a petition at law, whereby this action was instituted, and therein alleged the occurrence on…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Hess v. PawloskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Neirbo Co. v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- General Investment Co. v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Freeman v. Bee MacHine Co., IncSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Olberding v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Schwinn Bicycle Co. v. BrownDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1982
- Estate of Fitzpatrick v. BrehmDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1984