Pease v. Rathbun-Jones Engineering Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. The case is stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brandeis
Pease and Heye were sureties on a supersedeas bond given on appeal to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals in a suit to foreclose a vendor’s lien. The District Court for the Southern District of Texas had entered a decree against the People’s Light Company, declaring that Rathbun-Jones Engineering Co. “do have and recover” $6,804.90 with interest; establishing a lien on certain personal property; and directing that it be sold to satisfy the judgment, if the same be not paid within sixty days. The appellate court affirmed the decree. 218 Fed. Rep. 167. The mandate directed that the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Russell v. FarleySupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. McBrideSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Johnson v. Chicago & Pacific Elevator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Western Life Indemnity Co. of Ill. v. RuppSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Beall v. New MexicoSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- American Surety Co. v. BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Toledo Scale Co. v. Computing Scale Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Gary McDougald Cross-Appellant v. Vivian L. Jenson, Cross-Appellee, Clarence Ehli, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.