Legal Opinion

Comerford's Case

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided July 10, 1916PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPierce, J.

The evidence shows that the employee, Comerford, was and had been for three years before the accident in the employ of one Connors as a teamster; that the subscribers, McDonald and Joslin Company, speaking through a son of Joslin, the evening before the accident told Connors that they “wanted a teamster to take some concrete window-sills, wheelbarrows, picks and shovels out to Mattapan the next morning;” that these things to be taken were in the locker or enclosure at the corner of Langdon and Roswell Streets; that the “locker” is just a storehouse where odds and ends of tools and staging are…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pigeon's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  2. Sundine's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  3. Tornroos v. R. H. White Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
  4. W. S. Quinby Co. v. EsteyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
  5. King's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Matter of De Noyer v. . CavanaughNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  2. Scribner's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  3. Employers' L. A. Corp. v. Indus. Acc. Com.California Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Packett v. Moretown Creamery Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1917
  5. Sciola's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API