Legal Opinion

Umsted v. Scofield Engineering Construction Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 1928No. Docket No. L.A. 8852PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.

The question involved upon this appeal is whether defendant, Scofield Engineering Construction Company, a corporation, was the special employer of Howard Wilson Umsted, for whose death, alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the employees of said Construction Company, his father, Howard Claire Umsted, plaintiff herein, seeks to recover damages. If the Construction Company was, as it asserts, the special employer of decedent, plaintiff was without right to maintain an action for damages against it for the death of his son, but was limited to the remedy provided in the Workmen’s…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Estate of CasparCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Estate of SharonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  3. In Re Estate of BaldwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Flickenger v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Employers' L. A. Corp. v. Indus. Acc. Com.California Supreme Court · 1918

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Estate of LancesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Peterson v. LoganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Gavin v. Protestant Episcopal BishopCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Hunt v. United Bank & Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Kowalski v. Shell Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1979

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API