Legal Opinion
Pruitt v. Industrial Accident Commission
California Supreme Court
Decided August 30, 1922No. L. A. No. 7298PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWaste, J.
Petitioner W. L. Pruitt, seeks in this proceeding, on a writ of review, to have set aside and annulled an award of the Industrial Accident Commission, upon the ground that, as to him, the commission acted in excess of its powers and was without jurisdiction in the matter.
Two questions are presented for consideration. The first concerns the procedure followed in the hearing on the original application out of which the award arose. The second relates to the sufficiency of the evidence to support the finding of the commission in so far as it imposes a liability upon petitioner.
It appears from…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pigeon's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Matter of De Noyer v. . CavanaughNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Carstens v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Employers' L. A. Corp. v. Indus. Acc. Com.California Supreme Court · 1918
- Southern Pacific Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Mendel v. Fort Scott Hydraulic Cement Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1938
- Famous Players Lasky Corp. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Ybaibarriaga v. FarmerIdaho Supreme Court · 1924
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Independence Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.