Legal Opinion

Ross v. Duluth, Missabe & Iron Range Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 16, 1940No. 32,213PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gallagher, Chief Justice.

Appeal from an order denying defendant’s blended motion for judgment or for a new trial. The case was here before and was sent back for retrial. 203 Minn. 312, 281 N. W. 76, 271. The second trial resulted in a verdict for plaintiff for $18,500. The trial court, on defendant’s motion, granted a new trial but conditioned it upon failure of plaintiff to accept a reduction of the verdict to the sum of $15,000. Plaintiff accepted the reduction.

The facts were fully stated by Mr. Justice Loring in his opinion on the former appeal. A brief revieiv of those facts which are…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Mohr v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  2. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Ry. Co. v. MoquinSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Louisville & Jeffersonville Bridge Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  4. Goss v. GossSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
  5. Kipp v. ClingerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Ahlstrom v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  2. Kugling v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  3. Kleidon v. GlascockSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  4. Fewell v. TappanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  5. Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API