Ross v. Duluth, Missabe & Iron Range Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Gallagher, Chief Justice.
Appeal from an order denying defendant’s blended motion for judgment or for a new trial. The case was here before and was sent back for retrial. 203 Minn. 312, 281 N. W. 76, 271. The second trial resulted in a verdict for plaintiff for $18,500. The trial court, on defendant’s motion, granted a new trial but conditioned it upon failure of plaintiff to accept a reduction of the verdict to the sum of $15,000. Plaintiff accepted the reduction.
The facts were fully stated by Mr. Justice Loring in his opinion on the former appeal. A brief revieiv of those facts which are…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Mohr v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Ry. Co. v. MoquinSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Louisville & Jeffersonville Bridge Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Goss v. GossSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Kipp v. ClingerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Ahlstrom v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Kugling v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Kleidon v. GlascockSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- Fewell v. TappanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.