Legal Opinion

Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Ry. Co. v. Moquin

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 18, 1931No. 543PublishedCited by 122 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Roberts

Respondent sued petitioner in the district court of Crow Wing County, Minnesota, to recover damages for injuries sustained in the course of his employment in interstate commercé. The trial resulted in a verdict for the respondent, which petitioner moved to set aside on the ground that misconduct of respondent’s counsel in making appeals to passion and prejudice had prevented an impartial trial. The motion was denied, and petitioner appealed to the Supreme Court of Minnesota. That court referred to the state practice, which requires counsel to interrupt and have the language used by offending…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Moquin v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  2. Moquin v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway CoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930

3Cited by122 opinions

  1. Curtis Publishing Co. v. ButtsSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Martha Ann Brundage Rozier v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  3. Fairmount Glass Works v. Cub Fork Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. Salim Aoude v. Mobil Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
  5. Quick v. CraneIdaho Supreme Court · 1986

117 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API