Legal Opinion

Fewell v. Tappan

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 2, 1947No. 34,051PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Julius J. Olson, Justice.

Action to recover damages for fraud and conspiracy. Plaintiff’s case is founded upon his claim that defendants, by fraudulent means, prevailed upon him to part with his ownership of 700 shares of stock in defendant corporation at a grossly inadequate price. Defendants on this appeal are J. E. Tappan, his son, J. Elliot Tappan, Jr., and the corporation. Grace Tappan, wife of Elliot, was exonerated by direction of a verdict in her favor. Norman M. Reuterdahl was not served with process. Thus, there remains for determination here only the rights of plaintiff as against…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Mohr v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  2. Hicks v. StoneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1868
  3. Prince v. SonnesynSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  4. McGrath v. CannonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  5. Nelson v. Village of West DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. U.S. Bank N. A. v. Cold Spring Granite Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  2. Evans v. BlesiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  3. Advanced Communication Design, Inc. v. FollettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  4. Berreman v. West Publishing Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
  5. Gunderson v. Alliance of Computer Professionals, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API