Legal Opinion

Weed v. BACHNER CO. INC.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 2010No. S-13284PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CARPENETI, Chief Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

The sole question in this case is whether state procurement officials are entitled to absolute immunity or qualified immunity for common law claims arising from the bid evaluation process. In this case, a disappointed bidder sued the procurement officials individually after the administrative hearing officer in the bid protest proceeding found serious improprieties in the bid evaluation process. The officials moved for dismissal on the ground that they were absolutely immune. The superior court held that they were protected instead by only…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Aspen Exploration Corp. v. SheffieldAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Bowers Office Products, Inc. v. University of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Prentzel v. State, Department of Public SafetyAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Smith v. StaffordAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Gostovich v. City of West RichlandWashington Supreme Court · 1969

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Powercorp Alaska, LLC v. Alaska Energy AuthorityAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Cook Inlet Fisherman's Fund v. State, Department of Fish & GameAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Bachner Company, Inc. v. WeedAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Pacific Data Systems, Inc. v. Gov GuamSuperior Court of Guam · 2012
  5. Weed v. BACHNER CO. INC.Alaska Supreme Court · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API