Legal Opinion

Bachner Company, Inc. v. Weed

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 2013No. 6848 S-14629PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BOLGER, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Unsuccessful bidders on a public contract proposal filed a claim for intentional interference with prospective economic opportunity against four individual procurement committee members. The superior court found that the bidders failed to present a genuine issue of material fact regarding the committee members' alleged bad faith conduct. The superior court then held that the committee members were protected by qualified immunity and that the lawsuit was barred by the exclusive remedy statute. The court deemed the committee members prevailing parties and…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Kelley Property Development, Inc. v. Town of LebanonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  2. Totem Marine Tug & Barge, Inc. v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Hutchins v. SchwartzAlaska Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Municipality of Anchorage v. GentileAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
  5. L.D.G., Inc. v. BrownAlaska Supreme Court · 2009

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hagen v. StrobelAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Alaska Association of Naturopathic Physicians v. State, Division of Corporations, Business & Professional LicensingAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Cook Inlet Fisherman's Fund v. State, Department of Fish & GameAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
  4. DeVilbiss v. Matanuska-Susitna BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Manning v. State, Dept. of Fish & GameAlaska Supreme Court · 2018

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API