Legal Opinion

S.O.G. of Arkansas v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided December 15, 1976No. 4-75PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavis, Judge

This contract case, before us under the Wunderlich Act, 41 U.S.C. §§ 321-22, arose from plaintiff S.O.G. of Arkansas’ agreement to construct Lock and Dam No. 4 on the Arkansas Liver. The project, one unit of a system of seventeen locks and dams, was designed to help provide a navigable channel from the Mississippi Liver to Catoosa, Oklahoma. S.O.G., a joint venture formed to obtain and perform the contract, responded to a Corps of Engineers’ invitation for bid (IFB) issued in October 1974. The Government’s bid documents included a schematic diagram of cofferdams to be constructed of steel…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Beacon Construction Co. of Massachusetts v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  2. Blount Brothers Construction Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
  3. George W. Sturm, Doing Business as George W. Sturm Associates v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
  4. Space Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
  5. Jamsar, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1971

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Newsom v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
  2. Triax Pacific, Inc. v. Togo D. West, Jr., Secretary of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  3. Mega Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
  4. John H. Dalton, Secretary of the Navy v. Cessna Aircraft CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
  5. G.M. Shupe, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API