Legal Opinion

Housing & Redevelopment Authority Ex Rel. City of Richfield v. Walser Auto Sales, Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 18, 2002No. C8-01-309PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GILBERT, Justice.

In July, 2000, respondent Housing and Redevelopment Authority for the City of Richfield commenced a quick take condemnation pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 117.042 (2000) to acquire real property owned by appellants Walser Auto Sales, Inc., Motor-werks, Inc., R.J. Walser, Paul Walser, and Andrew Walser. Appellants objected to the condemnation petition and the district court held a trial. In January 2001, the court granted respondent’s petition. This case presents the issue of whether an appeal challenging the public purpose of a quick take condemnation pursuant to Minn.Stat.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Application of MinnegascoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  2. Matter of SchmidtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  3. City of Duluth v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  4. County of Blue Earth v. StauffenbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  5. State Ex Rel. McFarland v. ErskineSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wayzata Nissan, LLC v. Nissan North America, Inc., Stephen J. McDanielsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
  2. Pedro Alonzo v. Richard MenholtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2024
  3. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. v. SchwanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
  4. State v. HentgesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
  5. City of Granite Falls v. Soo Line RailroadCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API