Housing & Redevelopment Authority Ex Rel. City of Richfield v. Walser Auto Sales, Inc.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GILBERT, Justice.
In July, 2000, respondent Housing and Redevelopment Authority for the City of Richfield commenced a quick take condemnation pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 117.042 (2000) to acquire real property owned by appellants Walser Auto Sales, Inc., Motor-werks, Inc., R.J. Walser, Paul Walser, and Andrew Walser. Appellants objected to the condemnation petition and the district court held a trial. In January 2001, the court granted respondent’s petition. This case presents the issue of whether an appeal challenging the public purpose of a quick take condemnation pursuant to Minn.Stat.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Application of MinnegascoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Matter of SchmidtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- City of Duluth v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- County of Blue Earth v. StauffenbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- State Ex Rel. McFarland v. ErskineSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Wayzata Nissan, LLC v. Nissan North America, Inc., Stephen J. McDanielsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
- Pedro Alonzo v. Richard MenholtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2024
- Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. v. SchwanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
- State v. HentgesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- City of Granite Falls v. Soo Line RailroadCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.