Legal Opinion

City of Duluth v. State

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 1, 1986No. C4-86-984PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YETKA, Justice.

This case comes to this court on a petition for accelerated review from the judgment of the Sixth Judicial District Court, St. Louis County, granting the City of Duluth’s petition of condemnation and awarding Duluth title and possession of certain property. The property at issue is owned by Jeno and Lois Paulucci both directly and by companies they control and is located in West Duluth. We affirm the decision of the district court.

The issues raised in this appeal are:

1. Is there a “public use” for the taking of Pauluccis’ property under the Fifth Amendment to the United States…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Berman v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. Hawaii Housing Authority v. MidkiffSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. In Re Trust Known as Great Northern Iron Ore PropertiesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  5. Old Dominion Land Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. City of Norwood v. HorneyOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Jeno F. Paulucci and Lois Paulucci v. City of Duluth and Lake Superior Paper IndustriesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
  3. Kelo v. City of New LondonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  4. Dokman v. County of HennepinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
  5. Wegner v. Milwaukee Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API