Legal Opinion
Sparks v. Board of Dental Examiners
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 15, 1938No. Civ. No. 2032PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.
The petitioner sought and obtained a writ of review in an effort to annul an order of the respondent board suspending his license to practice dentistry for a period of five years. After a hearing the trial court entered a judgment affirming the order of the respondent board, from which judgment this appeal was taken.
The respondent has moved to dismiss this appeal upon the ground that the writ of certiorari will not lie to review the action of this board in revoking or suspending the license of a dental practitioner for the reason that in so suspending or revoking a license to practice…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Standard Oil Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Whitten v. California State Board of OptometryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Hartman v. Board of Chiropractic ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Jacobs v. Board of Dental ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- MacCracken v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Sparks v. Board of Dental ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942