Legal Opinion
Hartman v. Board of Chiropractic Examiners
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 31, 1937No. Civ. 10230PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
An appeal from the judgment in favor of the State Board of Chiropractic Examiners in a proceeding brought by appellant Hartman to review an order by the board revoking his license to practice chiropractic in the state of California.
The Chiropractic Act (Stats. 1923, p. lxxxviii) provides in section 10 that the board may revoke a license “for the employment of fraud or deception in applying” for it, and also that “Any person who is a licentiate . . . against whom any of the foregoing grounds for revoking ... is presented to the board with a view of having the board revoke ... a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Whitten v. California State Board of OptometryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Bold v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Holloway v. HollowaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Ex parte TylerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- In re LowenthalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Wayne v. Bureau of Private Investigators & AdjustersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Bernd v. EuCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Jacobs v. Board of Dental ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- MacCracken v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- O'DONNELL v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.