Legal Opinion

Berryman v. Metcalf

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided November 12, 2013No. 68544-9-IPublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBecker, J.

¶1 The trial court approved as reasonable a total of 468.55 hours billed by two attorneys for taking a minor soft tissue injury case through a short trial de novo, where the defendant did not improve its position after a mandatory arbitration. The court then applied a multiplier of 2.0 because counsel, working on a contingent fee arrangement, substantially risked receiving no compensation or inadequate compensation. Under the circumstances of this unexceptional case, the fee award of nearly $292,000 was an abuse of discretion. We reverse the award of attorney fees and remand for meaningful…

2Cases cited106 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. City of Burlington v. DagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Washington State Physicians Insurance Exchange & Ass'n v. Fisons Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Olympic Steamship Co., Inc. v. Centennial Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Bowers v. Transamerica Title InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1983

101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Miller v. KennyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  2. Johnston-Forbes v. MatsunagaWashington Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Deborah Ewing v. Green Tree Services LlcCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
  4. Cedar Grove Composting, Inc. v. City of MarysvilleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  5. White v. Clark CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API