Stacia Hartleben v. University Of Washington
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtLeach, J.
¶1 — Stacia Hartleben appeals the trial court’s summary judgment order dismissing her case against the University of Washington (University). She claims that the University violated the Washington Law Against Discrimination (WLAD) 1 when it refused to provide her with free classes as a reasonable accommodation for her disability. Because Hartleben fails to show that the University was required to waive her tuition in order to provide her comparable treatment under the WLAD, the University did not discriminate as a matter of law. We affirm.
FACTS
¶2 Hartleben attended Computational Linguistics…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Harris v. MillsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- US Airways, Inc. v. BarnettSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Riehl v. Foodmaker, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
- Riehl v. Foodmaker, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
- Fell v. Spokane Transit AuthorityWashington Supreme Court · 1996
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Avery v. City of SeattleDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2024
- Doe v. Fairfax Behavioral HealthDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2021
- Geneva Langworthy v. Alternative Humane Society And Adam P. KarpCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
- Hartleben v. Univ. of Wash.Washington Supreme Court · 2017
- Jayden Sundberg v. Shelton School District No. 309District Court, W.D. Washington · 2026
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.