Legal Opinion

State v. Slattum

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 19, 2013No. 67708-0-IPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLau, J.

¶1 RCW 10.73.170 provides for state-funded postconviction DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) testing to certain felons currently serving a “term of imprisonment.” Convicted sex offender Kevin Slattum moved for DNA testing after he completed his indeterminate minimum sentence prison time and while on community custody for life. The State opposed the motion, contending in part that the word “imprisonment” means the legislature intended to narrowly define eligibility for postconviction DNA testing only to felons actually serving a sentence in a jail or prison facility but not on community custody. The…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. State v. JacobsWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. ArmendarizWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. ArmendarizWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Davis v. Department of LicensingWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Lake v. Woodcreek Homeowners Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 2010

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Department of Social & Health Services v. Saint-LouisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  2. State v. ReisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  3. Payseno v. Kitsap CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  4. Clifford Payseno, V Kitsap CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  5. Henne v. City of YakimaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API