Legal Opinion

Bond v. Graf

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1939PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBelt, J.

This is an action to recover damages resulting from an alleged fraudulent transaction wherein plaintiff was induced to merge his interests in a motor freight line business with The PortlandPendleton Motor Freight Inc., a corporation, in which the defendants were the principal stockholders and executive officers. Plaintiff had his headquarters at La Grande, Oregon, and held a permit under the Public Utilities Commission of Oregon to operate as a common carrier of freight with fixed terminals at Baker, Pendleton, and Portland. The Portland-Pendleton company had its headquarters at Portland and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sharkey v. Burlingame Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1929
  2. State v. JenningsOregon Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Keady v. United Rys. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Larsen v. LootensOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Laam v. GreenOregon Supreme Court · 1922

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Conzelmann v. Northwest Poultry & Dairy Products Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Krause v. Eugene Dodge, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Heise v. Pilot Rock Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Horner v. WagyOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Hansen v. HolmbergOregon Supreme Court · 1945

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API