Legal Opinion

Laam v. Green

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1922PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBean, J.

Defendant contends that there was no competent testimony to show that Mrs. Green interfered with or prevented plaintiff from digging the potatoes at the proper season. With this we are unable to agree. We think the testimony tended to show that both her husband, Mr. Green, and Mr. Gibbons were acting on her behalf in the matter. As plaintiff testified, Mr. Green was present with Mrs. Green and plaintiff and took part in the negotiations for the lease and showed plaintiff the land. Plaintiff dealt with the two Greens. After plaintiff’s helpers had been prevented from digging the potatoes by…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. McDanielOregon Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Swank v. ElwertOregon Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Multnomah County v. Willamette Towing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1907
  4. McLeod v. DespainOregon Supreme Court · 1907
  5. First Nat. Bank v. Fire Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1898

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. HarrisOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Hall v. WorkOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  3. State Ex Rel. Kendall v. MohlerOregon Supreme Court · 1925
  4. In Re Rights to Use of Waters of Silvies RiverOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Black Ex Rel. Black v. IsaakIdaho Supreme Court · 1938

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API