Legal Opinion

State v. Jennings

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 17, 1929PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBossman, J.

The defendant was indicted under the provisions of Session Laws 1923, ch. 30, § 2, p. 41, charged with the crime of unlawfully possessing mash fit for the manufacture of intoxicating liquors. Upon the trial he was found guilty, and from the resulting judgment appeals. Although the record discloses only six assignments of error, based upon rulings of the circuit court, the brief of appellant argues 19 alleged errors. It is axiomatic under our practice that if a party desires to present a question for this court’s review he must first present his objection to the circuit court and obtain a…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Dunbar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. State v. McDanielOregon Supreme Court · 1901
  3. State v. MoreyOregon Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  5. Smith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. State v. RiggleWyoming Supreme Court · 1956
  2. State v. TauscherOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Burgess v. Charles A. Wing Agency, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Fidelity Security Corp. v. BrugmanOregon Supreme Court · 1931
  5. State v. MatthewsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API