Legal Opinion

Larsen v. Lootens

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1921PublishedCited by 21 opinions

From Multnomah: George Tazwell, Judge. In Banc. This is a motion to dismiss an appeal for want of a sufficient undertaking.

1Opinion of the Court

The case was tried in Multnomah County and the appellants served and filed an undertaking signed by sureties who lived in Deschutes County and obtained an ex parte order authorizing the justification of the sureties at Bend, Deschutes County, and directing the clerk to transmit the undertaking to the clerk of the Circuit Court of Deschutes County for justification there. The respondents moved the court to set aside' said order and require the sureties to justify in Multnomah County, but this was refused.

Subdivision 3 of Section 550, Or. L., provides:

“The qualifications of sureties in the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Roush v. Van HagenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Reeves v. PortaOregon Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Brown Et Ux v. Hassenstab Et UxOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Heise v. Pilot Rock Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Johnson v. CoferOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Hansen v. HolmbergOregon Supreme Court · 1945

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API