Legal Opinion

Gilliam v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 6, 1991No. CA 91-35PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

The attorney for the appellant has filed a “no merit” brief and a motion to be relieved as counsel in the appeal of the adjudication that appellant is a juvenile delinquent. The case is docketed on the civil docket of the Court of Appeals. Counsel asks that the motion and brief be provided to the appellant so that he may respond in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The Court of Appeals has certified the motion to this court to determine whether the provisions of Anders, which protect the adult appellant’s right to counsel on appeal, should apply to the appeal of an…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Penson v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. In re D.A.S.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
  2. McDonald v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  3. Linker-Flores v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  4. Matter of A.L.H.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1998
  5. Kou Her v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2015

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API