Legal Opinion

McDonald v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 12, 2004No. CR 03-957PublishedCited by 210 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jim Hannah, Justice.

This matter arises from contempt proceedings against attorney Laura L. Cunningham regarding a motion for rule on the clerk filed by her in her representation of Randolph McDonald. Cunningham asserts that this court erred in finding her notice of appeal untimely although it was filed more than six months after entry of the order appealed from in the notice. A notice of appeal must identify the order appealed from and must be filed within thirty days of the entry of the order appealed from. Cunningham failed to file a notice of appeal within thirty days of the order appealed…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Smith v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Harkness v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by210 opinions

  1. ADRIAN LOUIS CARNER v. STATE OF ARKANSASSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2018
  2. Flannery v. Arkansas Department of Health & Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  3. Wright v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  4. White v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  5. Ratliff v. Arkansas Department of Health & Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007

205 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API