Legal Opinion
American Federal Bank, FSB v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided November 7, 2003No. 95-498-CPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LETTOW, Judge.
Before the Court are cross-motions for partial summary judgment on liability in this Winstar-related case.1 Both plaintiffs and defendant’s motions are denied because genuine issues of material fact exist with regard to intent to contract, and a trial must be held to resolve those factual issues.
BACKGROUND
A. Regulatory and Procedural Setting
This case is one of many arising from the government’s efforts to address problems that arose with thrift banking institutions during the 1980s and early 1990s. A detailed account of the situation in that banking sector…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Long Island Savings Bank, FSB v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- American Federal Bank, FSB v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- First Annapolis Bancorp, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- American Federal Bank, FSB v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Atwood-Leisman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.