Legal Opinion

Atwood-Leisman v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided June 5, 2006No. 98-815CPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

LETTOW, Judge.

In this housing contract case, plaintiffs and defendant have both moved for partial summary judgment respecting plaintiffs’ breach of contract claim.1 Plaintiffs entered into mortgage contracts with the Farmer’s Home Administration (“FmHA”), a federal government agency, to provide low- and moderate-income rural housing.2 These mortgage contracts, which were entered into between 1974 and 1981, contained a provision that allowed the property owners to prepay their loans at any time and convert their property to market rents.3 The implementation of the contracts…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Migra v. Warren City School District Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Boeing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  2. PCL Construction Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  3. Burchick Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  4. Imprimis Investors LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  5. Schooner Harbor Ventures, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API