Legal Opinion

Oliver v. . Hood, Comr. of Banks

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 22, 1936PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

The ruling on the motion to dismiss is not appealable. Plemmons v. Imp. Co., 108 N. C., 614, 13 S. E., 188. The ruling on the demurrer is. Griffin v. Bank, 205 N. C., 253, 171 S. E., 71.

The appeal of the plaintiff from the levy of assessment was before us at the Spring Term, 1935, on a procedural question. In re Bank, 208 N. C., 65, 179 S. E., 24.

The present proceeding is a direct attack upon the summary judgment of assessment. Craddock v. Brinkley, 177 N. C., 125, 98 S. E., 280; Note, Ann. Cas., 1914 B, 82; 15 R. C. L., 839.

The demurrer admits facts properly pleaded, but not inferences or…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Plemmons v. Southern Improvement Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  2. Craddock v. . BrinkleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  3. Phifer v. . BerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  4. Corporation Commission v. . MurpheySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  5. Morris v. . CleveSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Abernethy v. . BurnsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  2. Cameron v. . McDonaldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. Downing v. . WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  4. Casey v. . BarkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  5. Citizens Bank of Marshall v. GahaganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API