Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Cockrell

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 15, 1931No. Docket No. 7927PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.

The two plaintiffs sued separately for damages for personal injuries. By stipulation the causes were tried together before the same jury. The plaintiff Taylor had a verdict for $1,000; the plaintiff Goff a verdict for $3,000. The defendant has appealed on typewritten transcripts and, by order of court, these appeals have been heard jointly.

The two plaintiffs were guests of the defendant, who was driving an automobile owned by him along the public highway running from Dublin to Walnut Creek at about midnight of September 18, 1929. The paved portion of this highway is banked in the middle for a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Krause v. RarityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Benjamin v. NoonanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Malone v. ClemowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  4. Redington v. Pac. Postal Tel. Cable Co.California Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Nangle v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Morris v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Swengil v. MartinNebraska Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Castro v. SinghCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  5. Dahl v. SpottsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API