Legal Opinion

Castro v. Singh

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 7, 1933No. Docket No. 747PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, J., pro tem.

This appeal is by defendant from a judgment in favor of plaintiffs in an action for personal injuries sustained by plaintiffs while riding as guests in defendant’s automobile. The case was tried before the court without a jury.

Appellant admits that respondents were guests, and his specifications of errors may be briefly summarized as follows:(1) That the complaint is defective in basic allegations;(2) That the findings are not supported by the evidence;(3) That the evidence does not justify any judgment for plaintiffs under the guest law;(4) That the court erred in…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Middleton v. Texas Power & Light Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Krause v. RarityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Callet v. AliotoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Insurance Co. v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  5. Pignaz v. BurnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Lowman v. StaffordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  2. Forsman v. ColtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  3. Barr v. CarrollCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Ferreira v. BarhamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  5. Nichols v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API