Castro v. Singh
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
CAMPBELL, J., pro tem.
This appeal is by defendant from a judgment in favor of plaintiffs in an action for personal injuries sustained by plaintiffs while riding as guests in defendant’s automobile. The case was tried before the court without a jury.
Appellant admits that respondents were guests, and his specifications of errors may be briefly summarized as follows:(1) That the complaint is defective in basic allegations;(2) That the findings are not supported by the evidence;(3) That the evidence does not justify any judgment for plaintiffs under the guest law;(4) That the court erred in…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Middleton v. Texas Power & Light Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1916
- Krause v. RarityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Callet v. AliotoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Insurance Co. v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Pignaz v. BurnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Lowman v. StaffordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Forsman v. ColtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Barr v. CarrollCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Ferreira v. BarhamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Nichols v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.