Legal Opinion

Swengil v. Martin

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1933No. 28692PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Chappell, District Judge.

The plaintiff,, appellee herein, recovered a judgment against the defendant, appellant herein, for personal injuries sustained in an automobile accident while a guest of defendant in his car then driven by him. Defendant appeals, relying, for reversal, upon the propositions that the trial court erred in overruling defendant’s motion for a directed verdict and in the giving of certain instructions upon its own motion and the refusal to give certain instructions requested by defendant.

The evidence, when considered most favorably for the plaintiff, discloses that on…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Altman v. AronsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
  2. Shaw, Admr. v. MooreSupreme Court of Vermont · 1932
  3. Morris v. ErskineNebraska Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Meeney v. DoyleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  5. Malone v. ClemowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Landrum v. RoddyNebraska Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Moncrief v. Interstate Transit LinesNebraska Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Born v. Estate of MatznerNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Loyal's Auto Exchange, Inc. v. MunchNebraska Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Meyer v. CulleyWyoming Supreme Court · 1952

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API