Legal Opinion
Castillo v. Friedman
Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California
Decided November 18, 1987No. Civ. A. No. 17098PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
COOPERMAN, P. J.
Statement of the Case
On April 4, 1983, plaintiff filed her complaint in the Los Angeles Municipal Court seeking damages for alleged wrongful eviction from an apartment building owned by defendant.
The first and second causes of action of the complaint generally sounded in fraud. The third cause of action of the complaint alleged that defendant had violated the Rent Stabilization Ordinance of the City of Los Angeles (hereafter Rent Stabilization Ordinance) by falsely representing that he needed possession of plaintiff’s apartment unit for occupancy by his mother.
On March…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Tameny v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 1980
- Bowers v. BernardsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Stoiber v. HoneychuckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Montalvo v. ZamoraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Aweeka v. BondsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Crusader Ins. Co. v. Scottsdale Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1997
- Yu v. Signet Bank/VirginiaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Club Rendezvous v. South Plaza AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- DeLisi v. LamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
- Duncan v. KihagiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021