Legal Opinion

Montalvo v. Zamora

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 28, 1970No. Civ. 1139PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

COAKLEY, J.

This appeal is from a judgment of dismissal following the sustaining, without leave to amend, of a general demurrer to the amended complaint, which pleads four causes of action. The order and memorandum sustaining the general demurrer recite that the demurrer is sustained upon the grounds that (1) no cause of action was stated, and (2) the court had no jurisdiction of the subject matter. The reason for lack of subject matter jurisdiction was not indicated. We assume, however, that it was upon the ground set forth in the defendant’s demurrer and points and authorities,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Texas & NOR Co. v. Brotherhood of Ry. & Steamship ClerksSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Petermann v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 396California Court of Appeal · 1959
  3. James v. Marinship Corp.California Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Walker v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Petri Cleaners, Inc. v. Automotive Employees, Laundry Drivers & Helpers Local No. 88California Supreme Court · 1960

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Tameny v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Geary v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Fortune v. National Cash Register Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  5. Parnar v. Americana Hotels, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1982

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API