Legal Opinion

Yu v. Signet Bank/Virginia

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 16, 1999No. A077911PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HANLON, P. J.

Appellants William and Darlene Yu filed this action individually and on behalf of others similarly situated against respondents Signet Bank/Virginia and Capital One Bank challenging respondents’ debt collection practices with respect to credit cards they issued to California residents. This appeal arises from the judgment entered for respondents after their motion for summary judgment was granted. We reverse the judgment as to appellants’ abuse of process and unlawful business practice claims, and affirm as to the other causes of action.

I. Background

Respondents are…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Kearney v. Salomon Smith Barney, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Wall Street Network, Ltd. v. New York Times Co.California Court of Appeal · 2008
  3. Olszewski v. Scripps HealthCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Adobe System Inc. v. Blue Source Group, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
  5. Nguyen v. FXCM Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API