Crusader Ins. Co. v. Scottsdale Ins. Co.
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ZEBROWSKI, J.
This case raises the question of the proper test for determining whether a regulatory statute creates a new private right to sue. Two competing approaches have been presented. The first is the “legislative intent approach.” The legislative intent approach examines the wording of the statute, its legislative history, its statutory context and similar factors, and asks whether the Legislature intended to create a new private right to sue by enacting the statute. The second approach is the “Restatement approach.” The Restatement approach follows the legislative intent…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- Applied Equipment Corp. v. Litton Saudi Arabia Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Moradi-Shalal v. Fireman's Fund Ins. CompaniesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Royal Globe Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- California Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Quiroz v. Seventh Avenue CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Reyes v. KoshaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Binder v. Aetna Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Haggis v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- Louie Hung Kwei Lu v. Hawaiian Gardens Casino, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2010
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.