Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Brown v. Superior Court of Sacramento County

California Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 2016No. S232642PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CORRIGAN, J.

Here we consider the scope of Elections Code provisions enacted in 2014, which created a new process by which a proposed initiative measure is submitted for public comment. (Elec. Code, § 9002.)1 After the comment period, the Ahorney General prepares an official circulating title and summary, including an estimate of the measure’s fiscal impact. (§ 9004.) The proponents may then solicit signatures to qualify their measure for the ballot.

The Legislature specified that any amendments to a measure submitted for comment must be “reasonably germane to the theme, purpose, or…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Raven v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Legislature v. EuCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Arnett v. Dal CieloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  4. People v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Franchise Tax Board v. CoryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Briggs v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  2. In re Edwards, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  3. People v. Superior Court (Alexander C.), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  4. People v. Superior Court, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  5. People v. Superior Court of Riverside Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2016

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API