Franchise Tax Board v. Cory
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PARAS, J.
I
A major purpose of the Political Reform Act of 1974 (hereinafter the Act) 1 is that “Receipts and expenditures in election campaigns should be fully and truthfully disclosed in order that the voters may be fully informed and improper practices may be inhibited.” (Gov. Code, § 81002, subd. (a).) 2 (See Socialist Workers etc. Committee v. Brown (1975) 53 Cal.App.3d 879, 888 and fn. 11 [125 Cal.Rptr. 915].) To carry out this purpose, the Act provides for the Franchise Tax Board to audit the financial reports submitted by candidates for public office. (§§ 90000-90006.) 3 It…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Stanson v. MottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Socialist Workers 1974 California Campaign Committee v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Balian Ice Cream Co. v. Arden Farms Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1950
- Robbins v. Omnibus RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- Assets Reconstruction Corp. v. MunsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
3Cited by32 opinions
- People v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Amwest Surety Insurance v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- People v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- County of San Diego v. San Diego NORMLCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Qualified Patients Assn. v. City of AnaheimCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.