Legal Opinion

Franchise Tax Board v. Cory

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 9, 1978No. Civ. 17244PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PARAS, J.

I

A major purpose of the Political Reform Act of 1974 (hereinafter the Act) 1 is that “Receipts and expenditures in election campaigns should be fully and truthfully disclosed in order that the voters may be fully informed and improper practices may be inhibited.” (Gov. Code, § 81002, subd. (a).) 2 (See Socialist Workers etc. Committee v. Brown (1975) 53 Cal.App.3d 879, 888 and fn. 11 [125 Cal.Rptr. 915].) To carry out this purpose, the Act provides for the Franchise Tax Board to audit the financial reports submitted by candidates for public office. (§§ 90000-90006.) 3 It…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stanson v. MottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Socialist Workers 1974 California Campaign Committee v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  3. Balian Ice Cream Co. v. Arden Farms Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1950
  4. Robbins v. Omnibus RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  5. Assets Reconstruction Corp. v. MunsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. People v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Amwest Surety Insurance v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. People v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  4. County of San Diego v. San Diego NORMLCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  5. Qualified Patients Assn. v. City of AnaheimCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API