People v. Superior Court of Riverside Cnty.
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
1Opinion of the CourtAaron, J.
*690I.
INTRODUCTION
On November 8, 2016, the voters passed Proposition 57,1 and the new law became effective the following day. As relevant to this writ proceeding, Proposition 57 eliminated the People's ability to directly file criminal charges against a juvenile defendant2 in a court of criminal jurisdiction (Adult Court). We must determine whether Proposition 57 applies to a pending case that the People directly filed in Adult Court against real party in interest, Jeremy Walker, several years prior to the effective date of the new law. We conclude that Proposition 57 does not apply to Walker's…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- In Re EstradaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- Evangelatos v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- People v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
- Tapia v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- People v. LedesmaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. Superior Court of Riverside Cnty.California Supreme Court · 2018
- J.N. v. Superior Court of Orange Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- People v. Pineda, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- People v. Brewer, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- People v. Navarra, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.