Legal Opinion

Kellogg v. Snell

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 30, 1928No. Docket No. 3535PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMPSON (B. L.), J., pro tem.

This is an appeal from a judgment for damages for failure to repurchase fifty shares of bank stock pursuant to contract. The appeal was perfected under the provisions of section 953a of the Code of Civil Procedure, on the ground that the findings are not supported by the evidence. No evidence or proceedings are printed in appellant’s brief.

Upon trial the court found the following facts: That the appellant was president of the board of directors of the Hollywood State Bank at Los Angeles, and that he owned fifty shares of the capital stock of said bank, of the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hulen v. StuartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Knarston v. Manhattan Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Walker v. Harbor Business Blocks Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
  4. California Raisin Growers' Ass'n v. AbbottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Greathouse v. DalenoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Nordin v. Eagle Rock State BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  2. McKee v. LynchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  3. Leiter v. EltingeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  4. Schmidt v. CainCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  5. Navone v. YoungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API