California Raisin Growers' Ass'n v. Abbott
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County and from an order denying a new trial. Geo. E. Church, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.
Certain defendants appeal from a judgment and from an order denying their motion for a new trial.
Plaintiff is an association, incorporated under the laws of California for the purpose, among others, as stated in the complaint, of “acting as an agent and factor in the handling and disposal of raisins for individuals, corporations, associations and copartnerships, and having power to contract,” as thereinafter alleged.
It appears that in the year 1903, plaintiff entered into contracts with some twenty-eight hundred persons, owners' and growers of raisins to pack and sell their crops. These…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Wickersham v. CrittendenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Lataillade v. OreñaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Santa Clara Valley Mill and Lumber Co. v. HayesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Levins v. RovegnoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Vulcan Powder Co. v. Hercules Powder Co.California Supreme Court · 1892
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- People v. BrophyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Finlay v. SwirskySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- Dyer Bros. I. Wks. v. Central I. Wks.California Supreme Court · 1920
- Bu-Vi-Bar Petroleum Corporation v. KrowCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930
- Kansas Wheat Growers Ass'n v. SchulteSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.