Legal Opinion

Navone v. Young

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 17, 1942No. Civ. No. 12093Published

1Opinion of the CourtWard, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment quieting respondent Hood’s title to, and establishing the fraud of appellant in the matter of a contract entered into between the parties to work, a parcel of mining land.

The facts of the case are as follows: F. H. Hood had for many years been the owner of a mining property, in connection with which he had been endeavoring to discover a method by which the minerals contained in the complex ore found thereon could be reduced and recovered. Plaintiff, a mechanic and mine operator, represented to Hood that he had discovered a method of reducing the ore; that he…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Buckner v. A. Leon & Co.California Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Stockburger v. DolanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  3. McKee v. LynchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  4. Kellogg v. SnellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API