Knarston v. Manhattan Life Insurance
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.
This action is brought to recover upon a. policy of life insurance. The cause was tried before a jury,, a verdict rendered in favor of plaintiff, and from an order denying its motion for a new trial defendant appeals. The-policy sued on contained the usual forfeiture clause, and the-defense is, that the policy had become forfeited prior to the death of the assured, by his failure to make payment of the semi-annual premium provided for therein. The facts in. the case, necessary to be stated, are that said semi-annual payment became due on November 15, 1895, and the general manager of the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Titus v. . Glens Falls Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Insurance Co. v. WolffSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Thompson v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Viele v. Germania InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
- People v. President & Directors of the Manhattan Co.New York Supreme Court · 1832
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Hansen v. Oregon-Wash. R. & N. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1920
- Sharon S. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Clark v. . WestNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
- People v. Ventura Refining Co.California Supreme Court · 1928
- People v. TugwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.