Legal Opinion
Schmidt v. Cain
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 10, 1928No. Docket No. 3503PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRESTON (H. L.), J., pro tem.
The plaintiff, G. P. Schmidt, brought this action to recover from defendant, W. H. Cain, the sum of $4,892.40, the purchase price of an article known as “No. 10 Glazed Back Walls,” used in the manufacture of gas heaters,^ alleged to have been sold and delivered to defendant.
The case was tried by the court sitting without a jury, and judgment was entered in favor of the defendant. Prom this judgment plaintiff prosecutes this appeal.
The amended complaint is in three counts. The first count alleges the making of a contract on May 11, 1922; the delivery of the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Treadwell v. NickelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Wilbur v. WilburCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- United Iron Works v. Outer Harbor Dock & Wharf Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
- Remsberg v. Hackney Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
- Torrey v. SheaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gruen Watch Co. v. Artists Alliance, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
- Weigle v. SalminoIdaho Supreme Court · 1930