Legal Opinion
Evans v. City of San Jose
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 14, 1992No. H008169PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
COTTLE, J.
Appellant Elaine Evans challenges here, as she did in the trial court, the facial constitutionality of those provisions of Streets and Highways Code section 36500 et seq. and San Jose Ordinance No. 22960 which authorize imposition of assessments on businesses for the purposes of general downtown promotion, the furnishing of music, and other expenditures unrelated to capital improvements. The trial court entered summary judgment in favor of the City of San Jose (city), ostensibly on the ground that Evans failed to exhaust her administrative remedies. For reasons we shall…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Abelleira v. District Court of AppealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Amador Valley Joint Union High School District v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- City and County of San Francisco v. FarrellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Duncan v. RamishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Rider v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Sinclair Paint Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Jacks v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
- Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Ass'n v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Bay Area Cellular Telephone Co. v. City of Union CityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Weisblat v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.