Legal Opinion
Tensor Group v. City of Glendale
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 4, 1993No. B065624PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GODOY PEREZ, J.
Plaintiffs/appellants Tensor Group, 116 W. Maple Avenue, and 1815 Orchard Avenue (collectively as Tensor) appeal from the judgment of dismissal entered upon the sustaining of the demurrer, without leave to amend, of defendant/respondent City of Glendale (the City). Tensor’s complaint against the City had sought damages for injuries allegedly caused by the City’s alleged inverse condemnation of its properties. The City’s demurrer was sustained on the grounds that Tensor’s suit was barred by the doctrine of res judicata, and, alternatively, Tensor’s complaint had failed to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Sutphin v. SpeikCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Eichman v. Fotomat Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1983
- Smith v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Le Parc Community Ass'n v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Citizens for Open Government v. City of LodiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Alpha Mechanical, Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc. v. Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Flying Dutchman Park, Inc. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Amin v. KhazindarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.