Legal Opinion
Amin v. Khazindar
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 6, 2003No. B157997PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MUÑOZ (Aurelio), J.
Faika Khazindar (Khazindar) appeals an order expunging a recorded homestead. The trial court held the homestead could not be asserted because it was barred by the doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel, relying on Krier v. Krier (1946) 28 Cal.2d 841 [172 P.2d 681]. Khazindar argues that Krier is inapplicable because in the instant case there was no homestead recorded at the time of trial and therefore the issue of her homestead could not have been asserted at that time, and further because her homestead declaration could not have been recorded until after…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Mycogen Corp. v. Monsanto Co.California Supreme Court · 2002
- Crowley v. KatlemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Droeger v. Friedman, Sloan & RossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Gamble v. General Foods Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1991
- South Santa Clara Valley Water Conservation District v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Villacres v. Abm Industries Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2010
- Bullock v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- Fidelity National Title Insurance v. SchroederCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Hong Sang Mkt., Inc. v. Peng, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Broadway Foreclosure Investments, LLC v. TarlessonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.