Legal Opinion

Zehring v. Brown Materials, Ltd.

District Court, S.D. California

Decided January 19, 1943No. 151 CivilPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, District Judge.

The plaintiffs seek overtime wages, penalties, attorneys’ fees and costs under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq.

During the period of their employment they worked on the repair of tractors, drag lines, concrete mixing trucks, dipper sticks, dump trucks and other similar paraphernalia and equipment owned or operated by the defendant.

The defendant’s business was described by its President as material dealer. It sold building materials such as rock, sand, cement, lime, brick, and similar things to the general public from its several yards or…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. United States v. DarbySupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. A. B. Kirschbaum Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  5. Keifer & Keifer v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Cannon v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Noonan v. Fruco Const. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
  3. Bowen v. New York News, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1973
  4. Belfont Sales Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987
  5. Kenney v. Wigton-Abbott CorporationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1948

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API