Belfont Sales Corp. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
AQUILINO, Judge:
This case challenges Customs Service classification under TSUS item 715.05 (“Watches”) of merchandise referred to collectively hereinafter as a quartz analogue watch or “QAW”. Duties were assessed under item 716.27 or item 716.29 according to the widths of those QAW elements considered “watch movements” and under item 720.24 or item 720.28, depending on the composition of their cases. The plaintiff claims that the merchandise was dutiable as an entirety under item 688.45 (“Electrical articles and electrical parts of arti cles, not specifically provided for: ... Other”).
I
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Union Wire Rope Corporation v. Atchison, T. & SF Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
- United States v. Texas Instruments, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1982
- Texas Instruments Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1979
- Texas Instruments Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1981
- Zehring v. Brown Materials, Ltd.District Court, S.D. California · 1943
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Belfont Sales Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
- State v. PRIONUtah Supreme Court · 2012
- D & M Watch Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1992
- Marcel Watch Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1992
- A Classic Time v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.