Legal Opinion
Noonan v. Fruco Const. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided December 13, 1943No. 12637PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOODROUGH, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from an order dismissing an action by employees of the Fruco Construction Company against their employer for overtime pay alleged to be due them under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq.
Under Section 7 of the Fair Labor Standards Act, any employer must pay overtime compensation to any of his em ployees “engaged in * * * the production of goods for commerce.” Section 3 (j) provides that “for the purposes of this Act an employee shall be deemed to have been engaged in the production of goods if such employee was employed * *…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. MisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- A. B. Kirschbaum Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Walling v. Jacksonville Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Overstreet v. North Shore Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Ritch v. Puget Sound Bridge & Dredging Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946
- United States v. Sandy Sommerville, Trading and Doing Business Under the Name and Style, New Wilmington Livestock AuctionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1964
- Keen v. Mid-Continent Petroleum CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1945
- Crabb v. Welden Bros.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1947
- Fruco Const. Co. v. McClellandCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1951
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.